A New York State casino referendum for voters has one attorney questioning the ballot’s wording november
In November, ny voters are scheduled to vote for a referendum that could enable several new casino resorts become built throughout the state. But if one Brooklyn lawyer is successful, that referendum shall be halted due to language within the ballot question which he claims violates state legislation.
Referendum Language Questioned
The language in the referendum carries a wide range of ‘legislative purposes’ that paint the proposition in an unmistakably positive light. For example, the concern mentions ‘promoting work growth, increasing aid to schools and permitting regional governments to lower property taxes.’ That language was authorized by their state Board of Elections in July.
But now, lawyer Eric J. Snyder is contending that the language in the bill violates New York law. According to case filed into the New York State Supreme Court, Snyder alleges that the language violates the State Constitution’s prohibition on the usage of public money in the aid of ‘private undertakings.’
‘The Constitution is pretty clear that you cannot use money that is public sway or influence a vote,’ Snyder said.
Snyder isn’t the only one who has taken up difficulties with the language within the referendum. Many government watchdog groups also notice it as one-sided, and spiritual teams have also noted the language used when Continue reading